Leaderboard / #4 of 13 / Installed or launched
Emdash
Cross-platform users who want issue-tracker-driven worktrees.
Weighted feature assessment74.5range 72.0 to 77.0doc coverage 95% / Launchedmeasured: Launch probe
Scores by category
Rubric breakdown
- AAgent breadthweight 154
- BIsolation and parallelismweight 154
- CReview, merge and PR flowweight 153
- DRemote, cloud and mobile reachweight 103
- EOpenness and licenseweight 105
- FMaturity and momentumweight 154
- GLinux setup friction (measured)weight 103
- HPricing and BYO modelweight 55
- IDocs and transparencyweight 5n/r
Verdict
Strengths and weaknesses
Strengths
- Apache-2.0, Win/mac/Linux
- SSH remotes
Weaknesses
- 3.9 GB idle footprint in our probe
Evidence
What we saw and where it came from
- Hands-on (this box)
- Launched on Linux (6.6 s) with the largest footprint we saw: 3.9 GB RSS across 23 processes at idle.
- Launch probe
- First window 6.59 s, process-tree RSS 3932 MB on Xvfb.
- Notes
- Canary channel builds ship frequently (v1.2.8-canary.101).

Sources
Feature facts
From docs, repos and our probes
- Platforms
- Windows (exe/msi), macOS, Linux (AppImage/deb/rpm)
- Supported agents
- sec: 25+ agent CLIs incl. Claude Code, Codex
- Parallelism
- Worktrees; remote over SSH
- Isolation
- Git worktrees
- Review, merge, PR
- sec: diff review, PRs, issues from Linear/Jira/GitHub
- Remote, cloud, mobile
- SSH remotes (sec)
- MCP
- unknown
- Cost visibility
- unknown
- Model choice
- Any provider (repo tagline)
- Setup
- Install app; GitHub connect prompt has 'Skip for now'
"unknown" means we found no source and did not guess.